Document: TRIAL MINUTES
Link: [Open PDF] https://42o.org/l3g4l/ 11.0 TRIAL MINUTES 2017-08-14 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2017-08-14
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The trial minutes indicate that Aaron Surina, was present or represented by counsel, while the petitioner was also present or represented by counsel. However, the court’s finding is not clearly stated in the document, leaving room for ambiguity and potential unfairness.
From the father’s perspective, the lack of a clear court finding in the trial minutes could suggest a lack of transparency or thorough consideration of the case. This ambiguity may indicate potential judicial bias or unethical conduct, as it is essential for the court to provide a clear and reasoned decision based on the evidence presented.
Furthermore, if the court failed to issue a clear ruling or decision, it could result in further injustices for Aaron Surina and his two sons, David and Andrew. Without a definitive outcome, the rights of the Surina family to statutory relief and protection from harm may have been disregarded or undermined.
Overall, the trial minutes reflect potential unfairness or unethical conduct in the handling of the case involving Aaron Surina and his efforts to protect his children from harm. The lack of a clear court finding raises concerns about judicial bias and the denial of justice for the Surina family.
About The Author
