Document: TRIAL MINUTES
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l//11.0 TRIAL MINUTES 2017-08-14 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2017-08-14
Summary (Justice Demanded)
From the father’s perspective, this court document reflects unethical conduct and judicial bias. The document shows that the petitioner, Aaron Surina, was present or represented by counsel, while the respondent was not present or represented. This raises concerns about fairness and due process, as both parties should have equal opportunities to present their case.
Additionally, the court’s finding that the respondent was not present or represented may indicate a lack of consideration for the respondent’s rights and perspective. This one-sided approach can lead to unjust outcomes and further perpetuate any existing biases against the respondent.
Overall, this document suggests a lack of fairness and impartiality in the proceedings, which is concerning for the father, Aaron Surina, who has been trying to protect his children from harm. The court’s failure to ensure equal representation and consideration for both parties undermines the integrity of the legal process and raises questions about the ethical conduct of the judicial system in this case.
About The Author
