Document: REPLY AFFIDAVIT OF PETITIONER
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l//118.0 REPLY AFFIDAVIT OF PETITIONER 2018-01-22 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2018-01-22
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The reply affidavit in the ongoing family court matter involving Aaron Surina and Sirinya Surina presents a contentious situation with potential injustices and unethical conduct. From Aaron’s perspective, the document reveals several concerning aspects:
1. False Allegations of Abuse: Sirinya accuses Aaron of blaming her for the alleged abuse of their children without evidence, suggesting a lack of credibility in her claims. She also accuses Aaron of coaching their son to lie and alienating her from the children, which may indicate a biased perspective against Aaron.
2. Invasion of Privacy: Sirinya alleges that Aaron invaded her privacy by installing surveillance devices in their home, raising serious concerns about boundaries and trust. This behavior reflects a lack of respect for personal space and may indicate questionable intentions on Aaron’s part.
3. Unfair Financial Demands: Sirinya requests the court to appoint a Guardian Ad Litem at Aaron’s expense and demands a significant amount in attorney fees, potentially burdening Aaron financially. These demands appear one-sided and may not align with fair and equitable proceedings.
4. Potentially Threatening Language: The document concludes with disjointed and potentially threatening statements, which could be interpreted as an attempt to intimidate or confuse the court. Such language is unprofessional and raises doubts about Sirinya’s intentions and conduct in the legal process.
Overall, the affidavit raises concerns about bias, false accusations, invasion of privacy, unfair financial demands, and potentially threatening language, all of which may suggest an unjust treatment of Aaron Surina and his children in the legal proceedings. It is crucial for the court to carefully review the evidence presented and prioritize the best interests of the children to ensure a fair and just resolution in the case.
About The Author
