Document: ORDER OF CONTINUANCE
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/13.0 ORDER OF CONTINUANCE 2017-08-23 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2017-08-23
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Document title: ORDER OF CONTINUANCE
The court document reveals several instances of potential prejudice and unfair treatment against Aaron Surina, the Respondent. Despite Aaron rightfully requesting a continuance to the hearing due to newly appointed counsel, the court has imposed arguably unwarranted restrictions founded on dubious grounds.
The court has enacted several stringent orders concerning Aaron’s time with his children, limiting his visitation rights to very specific dates and hours, which could be seen as excessively restrictive. Furthermore, the court’s order for Aaron to abstain from alcohol or marijuana 24 hours before or during visitation could be viewed as prejudiced without demonstrated evidence of substance misuse by him. This order carries an implicit assumption of substance abuse, which if unsubstantiated, could be interpreted as biased.
The vague instruction maintaining that “Section 12 restraints are mostly controlled by the Respondent and shall continue to apply to him” appears to place an undue burden on Aaron without offering clear guidelines regarding these restraints.
Moreover, the directive that the children should be exchanged at the family residence by the children’s maternal and/or paternal grandmother seems to infringe on Aaron’s autonomy to independently spend time with his children.
In contrast, the second document provided does not contain any content related to Aaron Surina’s case, court proceedings, or decisions. It merely offers an address in Spokane, WA, and telephone and facsimile numbers. Therefore, it is impossible to generate a father-favorable summary or identify any instances of unfairness, unethical conduct, or judicial bias towards Aaron Surina based on this information.
In conclusion, the main court document seems to manifest a bias against Aaron Surina by imposing overly rigid conditions on his interactions with his children, suggesting prejudice against him without substantiated evidence.
About The Author
