Document: ORDER OF CONTINUANCE
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l//13.0 ORDER OF CONTINUANCE 2017-08-23 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2017-08-23
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The “ORDER OF CONTINUANCE” document reveals potential instances of unfairness and unethical conduct, particularly favoring the Petitioner, Sirinya Surina, over the father, Aaron Surina, and their children. The order was granted based on the Respondent’s request for more time to hire counsel, without considering the impact on Aaron Surina or his sons, indicating potential bias. The residential time arrangements heavily favor Sirinya Surina, with limited visitation granted to Aaron. The specified curbside exchange location raises concerns about Aaron’s access to his children and the potential for conflicts. Additionally, restraining orders included in the document lack clear evidence or justification, potentially prejudicing Aaron. The restrictions imposed on him, such as regarding alcohol and marijuana consumption, seem arbitrary and unsupported by evidence. This document suggests a lack of consideration for Aaron’s rights and raises questions about the fairness and ethical conduct of the court, particularly regarding attorneys like Stanley Kempner or Keith Glanzer representing Sirinya Surina or Carl Wilson. The potential delays caused by continuances could harm the children and prevent them from receiving necessary protection, indicating a lack of urgency or consideration for the Surina family’s well-being. It is crucial to review these circumstances thoroughly to address any injustices or biases against Aaron Surina and his children and ensure their rights and well-being are protected in the legal proceedings.
About The Author
