Document: ORDER OF CONTINUANCE
Link: [Open PDF] ( https://42o.org/l3g4l//13.0 ORDER OF CONTINUANCE 2017-08-23 .pdf )
Filing Date: 2017-08-23
Summary:
The document, titled “ORDER OF CONTINUANCE,” reveals concerning aspects from Aaron Surina’s perspective, suggesting potential unethical conduct and bias in the legal proceedings. The order was granted based on the Respondent’s motion without clear justification beyond hiring new counsel, indicating possible favoritism towards one party. Residential time arrangements heavily favor the Petitioner, providing limited and specific times for Aaron to spend with his children, David and Andrew, which may not be in the children’s best interests.
Moreover, the document’s language, emphasizing restraining orders and restrictions on Aaron’s behavior without similar limitations on the mother, raises concerns about bias. Requirements for Aaron to abstain from alcohol and marijuana before and during visitation, along with prohibitions on speaking negatively about the mother, could portray him unfairly. This unequal treatment could impact Aaron’s access to his children and potentially harm his reputation compared to the mother.
Furthermore, the Order of Continuance in the case prolongs the resolution, potentially exacerbating any injustices experienced by Aaron and his sons. This delay may be viewed as unethical if it needlessly extends the legal process. If there is a pattern of bias against Aaron in the court proceedings, this continuance reflects ongoing partiality. Overall, the document underscores Aaron’s frustration and perceived injustices in the legal process, hindering his efforts to protect his children and seek relief.
About The Author
