Document: MOTION TO MOD TEMP CHILD SUPP
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/141.0 MOTION TO MOD TEMP CHILD SUPP 2018-02-09 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2018-02-09
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The court document titled “Motion to Mod Temp Child Supp” suggests a proposed modification in temporary child support, which from Aaron Surina’s perspective, appears potentially unjust and biased. The document indicates that Aaron may not be allowed to testify at the motion hearing, a move that could deny him an opportunity to present his case and contest the motion. This implies a lack of transparency and a potential denial of fair representation, which is fundamental in upholding the principle of equality before the law.
Moreover, Aaron seems to be under pressure to file and serve his papers by a specified deadline, risking his side of the story not being considered if he fails to meet this timeframe. This raises concerns about the court’s impartiality, especially if Aaron was not given reasonable time to prepare his response, infringing on his right to a fair trial.
The document also outlines a proposed order without detailing its contents, which could disadvantage Aaron if it’s unfavorable to him. The absence of specifics regarding the proposed order and its implications can be construed as unethical conduct. The court’s apparent reliance on documents presented by only one party without considering Aaron’s input or financial situation in determining child support further underlines this potential bias and lack of transparency.
The court’s decisions, as presented in these documents, seem to be one-sided, approved based on the respondent’s input, and without apparent consideration of Aaron’s viewpoint. This not only raises concerns about the impartiality of the court but also indicates a potential procedural injustice. The failure to provide Aaron with adequate notice about the court’s orders compromises his ability to contest or prepare for these decisions, further undermining his right to fair representation.
In summary, the court documents reflect a potential bias and lack of transparency in the legal proceedings against Aaron Surina. The potential denial of an opportunity to testify, the pressure to respond within a limited timeframe, and the court’s apparent reliance on one-sided input raise serious concerns about fairness, ethical conduct, and the upholding of the principles of justice.
About The Author
