Document: TRIAL MINUTES
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/164.0 TRIAL MINUTES 2018-03-06 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2018-03-06
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The court documents from the trial held on March 6, 2018, seem to demonstrate a considerable imbalance in legal representation that may have unfairly disadvantaged Aaron Surina. Mr. Surina, the defendant in a family law case, was self-represented (pro-se), while the petitioner, Siriny Surina, had the services of an attorney, Keith Glanzer. This disparity could be seen as an inequity, potentially denying Mr. Surina the same level of legal guidance and advocacy as Ms. Surina.
Furthermore, it is unclear from the document whether the proceedings were conducted in a language that Mr. Surina is fully comfortable with, as an interpreter for the Thai language was present via a call. If Mr. Surina doesn’t understand Thai, this might imply a bias in the court proceedings against him.
Lastly, the court took the matter under advisement. This lack of immediate decision could be seen as an additional stressor for Mr. Surina, prolonging uncertainty and potentially compounding the perceived unfairness of the trial. Without further context, this could potentially be seen as a component of judicial bias against Mr. Surina.
Overall, the document may be seen as indicative of an unfair trial, due to the disparity in legal representation, potential language barriers, and the absence of an immediate verdict.
About The Author
