Document: PROPOSED PARENTING PLAN
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/169.0 PROPOSED PARENTING PLAN 2018-03-15 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2018-03-15
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Document title: PROPOSED PARENTING PLAN
Combined Summary:
The Proposed Parenting Plan document, which seems to be drafted without clear specification of any limitations or accusations against either parent, potentially exhibits an unfair bias against Aaron Surina. The document outlines the possibility of ‘no contact’ or ‘limited contact’ with the children without clearly articulated reasons, implying the potential of prejudiced rulings against him. The plan also appears to be inclined towards limiting Mr. Surina’s involvement in major decisions concerning the children, based on unspecified ‘problems.’ The dispute resolution process also appears biased, implying potential barriers for Mr. Surina seeking judicial intervention.
The division of parental responsibilities and allocation of time spent with the children leans heavily towards the mother, potentially creating a bias favoring her in future proceedings. The lack of clarity regarding the financial responsibilities of each parent and the ambiguous language in the dispute resolution process could result in unfair financial obligation being put on Aaron. The parenting time schedule is incomplete, potentially resulting in Aaron being denied a fair share of time with his children.
The document lacks specificity regarding the division of time spent with the children during weekdays, weekends, and significant holidays, potentially resulting in a disadvantageous or inequitable allocation of time for Mr. Surina. The transportation arrangements, along with the need for a witness, could be perceived as an undue burden placed on Aaron.
The document allows the relocating parent to move the children to a different school district with a mere 60 days’ notice, without adequate consideration of Aaron’s rights. It also permits the relocating parent to move without giving notice if they believe that giving notice would put them or the child at an unreasonable risk of harm. This could be unfairly manipulated against Aaron, without due investigation or evidence.
Furthermore, the document does not clearly specify who is proposing this plan, potentially masking any unjust or biased claims against the father. The section titled “Findings of Fact” also raises concerns, as it adopts the statements in section 3, about putting limitations on a parent, without providing its content. The document also allows for the court to sign without notice to the father, potentially enabling decisions against Aaron’s interests without his knowledge.
Overall, the document seems to restrict Mr. Surina’s rights and involvement as a parent without providing clear explanations or evidence for these limitations. Its lack of transparency, potential bias, and seeming inequitable division of time could be perceived as unfair and potentially unethical, putting Aaron at a disadvantage.
About The Author
