Document: PROPOSED ORDER-FINDINGS
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/175.0 PROPOSED ORDER-FINDINGS 2018-03-15 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2018-03-15
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Unified Summary:
The court documents from the Superior Court of Washington, County of Seca NE, concerning the marriage/domestic partnership of Aaron Surina and Sy Nya Sucing, reveal several inconsistencies and areas of concern potentially indicative of bias against Aaron Surina. The court has approved an order without providing clear reasoning or specific findings, leading to a lack of transparency and potential unfairness.
Decisions have been made regarding restrictions and obligations on Aaron concerning the care of his children, David and Andrenl, which could infringe on Aaron’s paternal rights. The lack of clear reasoning for these decisions, coupled with financial ambiguities regarding spousal support, puts Aaron in a position of uncertainty that could impact his relationship with his children and financial stability.
Further, the documents are ambiguous about the identities of the petitioner and respondent, potentially obscuring decisions that may disadvantage Aaron. Decisions on the use of family home and protection of properties, division of household expenses and debts, and changes to insurance policies are left unclear, potentially disadvantaging Aaron and causing unnecessary confusion. Ambiguity about who bears the cost of fees, including lawyer fees, could result in an unfair financial burden on Aaron.
Moreover, an unusually high interest rate of 12% was applied to the money judgment without clear justification, potentially placing an undue financial burden on Aaron. A request for a restraining order was denied without a stated reason, suggesting Aaron’s safety concerns may not have been fully considered.
The document’s use of vague terms and unclear language, such as “other temporary orders” without explanation, could obstruct Aaron’s understanding of his rights and obligations, potentially indicative of unethical conduct.
In conclusion, the court documents reveal a lack of transparency, potential financial bias, possible disregard for Aaron’s safety concerns, and elements of unfairness and unethical conduct against Aaron Surina. These findings suggest a potential bias against Aaron, which may have negatively affected his relationship with his children, his financial stability, and his overall understanding and response to the court’s decisions.
About The Author
