Document: ORDER OF CONTINUANCE
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/177.0 ORDER OF CONTINUANCE 2018-03-27 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2018-03-27
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The court document reflects an arguably unfair situation wherein Aaron Surina, the respondent, sees his motion for modification of a temporary family law order delayed. This postponement is due to the fact that his ex-spouse’s counsel is out of town and needs additional time to respond. The court granted this continuance seemingly without considering Aaron’s need for an expedited resolution. The delay in hearing may be viewed as a bias favoring the petitioner since her inability to respond in a timely manner is prioritized over Aaron’s request for prompt action. Furthermore, Aaron is representing himself, which may put him at a disadvantage compared to his ex-spouse who has legal representation. This could be seen as an injustice, as it may hinder his ability to argue his case effectively. The court document, therefore, could be interpreted as reflecting an unfair bias against Aaron.
About The Author
