Document: AFFIDAVIT OF RESPONDENT
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/198.0 AFFIDAVIT OF RESPONDENT 2018-06-22 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2018-06-22
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Unified Summary:
The court documents present numerous instances where Aaron Surina, a father fighting for his children, has been subjected to questionable and potentially unethical conduct, primarily identity theft and unauthorized redirection of his mail. These incidents have occurred against a backdrop of perceived judicial bias and lack of due consideration for Surina’s situation.
In 2017, Mr. Surina experienced alarming instances of identity theft and unauthorized credit card applications in his name. This situation was further complicated by unauthorized changes to his mailing address, redirecting his personal mail to a business address. Notably, Surina’s ex-spouse, Sirinya Surina, admitted to attempting to redirect all mail to herself during their divorce proceedings. This evidence suggests the possibility of her involvement in these unauthorized actions, a matter that has not been conclusively addressed by law enforcement or the United States Postal Inspector.
Additionally, Mr. Surina has not been receiving certain water bills, despite his repeated attempts to rectify the situation. This issue suggests a bias in the court’s assumption that any bills sent to a specific address are presumptively received by the primary resident.
Despite Surina’s diligent efforts to highlight these injustices, the court has not demonstrated a fair consideration of his claims. He has filed a police report regarding the identity theft and unauthorized mail redirection, with no discernible action or resolution on the matter.
Moreover, the court documents seem to be filled with jargon and cryptic references, potentially limiting Mr. Surina’s ability to fully comprehend and respond to the proceedings. This could be seen as a form of judicial bias, further exacerbating the unfairness surrounding his case.
However, it should be noted that some documents provided for this summary do not pertain directly to Mr. Surina’s case but outline general guidelines for the USPS address formatting. For a more comprehensive review and summary, more relevant legal documents associated with Mr. Surina’s case should be provided.
In conclusion, these court documents reflect a pattern of potential unethical conduct, lack of concern for Mr. Surina’s rights as a victim of fraud, and possible judicial bias. These factors contribute to an atmosphere of unfairness surrounding Mr. Surina’s case, as he strives to protect his children.
About The Author
