Document: ORDER RE SALE OF RESIDENCE ETC
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/213.0 ORDER RE SALE OF RESIDENCE ETC 2018-08-10 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2018-08-10
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Document title: ORDER RE SALE OF RESIDENCE ETC
The court order, which is not a result of a mutual agreement but instead proposed by Sirinya’s attorney, enforces an immediate sale of the family residence owned by Aaron Michael Surina and his ex-spouse, Sirinya Surina. This could imply a bias in favor of Sirinya and potentially represents an unfair and hasty decision without considering the potential emotional and financial impact on Mr. Surina.
Moreover, the court permits Sirinya to continue residing in the house until the sale, a privilege not extended to Mr. Surina. This unilateral decision might be viewed as a disregard for Mr. Surina’s rights as an equal homeowner, suggesting bias and unfairness towards him.
The order also stipulates that the net proceeds from the sale, after deductions, be deposited into the trust of Sirinya’s attorney, Keith A. Glanzer. This raises concerns of a potential conflict of interest as Glanzer could benefit from the sale, potentially at Mr. Surina’s expense.
Additionally, the court order requires that part of the proceeds from the sale be used to pay for a Guardian ad Litem, appointed without Mr. Surina’s consent. This might be interpreted as an unjust financial imposition on Mr. Surina and a disregard for his financial welfare.
However, without more detailed information or context about Aaron Surina’s case, it is challenging to ascertain the extent of unfairness, unethical conduct, judicial bias, or injustices against him. Although the document title and attorneys for both parties are identified, more comprehensive data or a complete document is needed for a thorough analysis.
About The Author
