Document: ORD FOR CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL DATE
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/215.0 ORD FOR CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL DATE 2018-08-30 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2018-08-30
Summary (Justice Demanded)
This court document pertains to the continuance of a trial date in the matter of Aaron Michael Surina’s marital case. From the perspective of Mr. Surina, the document could potentially suggest unfairness or bias. This is primarily due to the fact that despite both parties agreeing to move the trial date, the delay can be seen as a disadvantage to him, prolonging the legal process and extending emotional and financial strain.
Moreover, the court’s order to hire a Guardian ad Litem and undergo mediation, which have not been completed yet, may indicate a bias. These actions might be seen as an imposition on Mr. Surina’s rights, especially if he disagreed with them. The document does not specify why these tasks were not completed, which could be due to lack of resources or time, further exacerbating the perceived unfairness.
It could also be argued that the continuance of the discovery cutoff to be 45 days before the trial might put Mr. Surina at a disadvantage; if new evidence surfaces after this cutoff, it may not be considered in the trial. Lastly, the issuance of an Amended Domestic Case Schedule Order could reflect an injustice, as it could imply a change in the trial process which may not be in Mr. Surina’s favor.
Overall, while the document does not explicitly show unethical conduct or bias, it is crucial to consider the potential implications and perceived injustices from Mr. Surina’s perspective.
About The Author
