Document: DECLARATION AFFIDAVIT
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/217.0 DECLARATION AFFIDAVIT 2018-12-31 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2018-12-31
Summary (Justice Demanded)
In the legal proceedings concerning Aaron Surina, several instances of potential bias, unfair treatment, and possibly unethical conduct have been identified. The court documents reveal a lack of transparency and disregard for Aaron’s rights and interests in the sale of a shared property, managed by Donna Henry.
Aaron’s concerns and preferences were largely overlooked. His preference for a stronger offer was disregarded, and his apprehensions about a pre-approval letter were not adequately addressed. Instead, Donna recommended another lender without addressing his concerns comprehensively.
Furthermore, Aaron’s refusal to sign an offer with the seller disclosure, a document crucial for transparency, was not appropriately addressed. It was instead removed, pressuring him to sign, which could be perceived as coercive and disregarding his rights to full disclosure.
The documents also show a dismissive attitude towards Aaron in Donna’s email correspondence, suggesting a lack of proper communication and respect. An escalation addendum, which can significantly influence the final sale price, added unnecessary complexity to the situation without proper explanation provided to Aaron.
Aaron’s email communication questions the absence of an offer from prospective buyers in California, which he expected. The disregard or omission of this offer might indicate an unfair process, potentially prejudicing his interests.
Moreover, Aaron’s lawyer and the real estate agent have been accused of breaching their professional responsibilities. The agent revealed sensitive information about the house sale and conspired to substitute the title company. Aaron’s lawyer refused to provide a contact phone number, restricting his ability to seek legal guidance.
Unusual modifications of a default judgment in Aaron’s favor to a continuance, without clear explanation, raise questions about the fairness of the judicial process. Aaron also suspects his ex-partner, Sirinya, unknowingly signed her powers away, potentially impacting him legally or financially.
In conclusion, these proceedings appear to demonstrate a clear bias against Aaron Surina, suggesting potential injustices and unethical conduct by various parties involved. If these allegations hold true, it underlines the need for a thorough review of these proceedings to ensure Aaron’s rights are adequately protected.
About The Author
