Document: MOTION
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/218.0 MOTION 2018-12-31 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2018-12-31
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Document title: MOTION
The court document under review reveals a motion for contempt against Aaron Michael Surina, potentially indicative of an inherent bias or unjust conduct against him. The document suggests that Aaron is being treated unfavorably, being held in contempt without an appropriate chance to defend his actions or reasons.
The document details three court orders that Aaron allegedly failed to comply with, including a temporary order to pay vehicle expenses, an order denying the modification of child support, and an allocation of community expenses, as well as an order to place the family residence for sale immediately. These orders inevitably impose a significant financial burden on Aaron without any evident justification or consideration of his financial situation, potentially highlighting an unjust treatment.
The petitioner, Sirinya Surina, is not only asking the court to find Aaron in contempt but also seeks to subject him to fines and demand him to pay her attorney fees. This appears to be an additional layer of pressure exerted on Aaron, intensifying the emotional and financial stress he is already facing, which might be perceived as an unfair and unethical conduct.
Moreover, the petitioner seeks to have the family residence characterized as community property and divided equitably. Still, she also desires to be named as the sole manager of the sale of the house. This seems to be an attempt to control the situation and possibly manipulate the outcome to her advantage, further highlighting potential injustices against Aaron.
However, the document lacks enough context or specific information to fully determine the extent of any potential bias, unfairness, or unethical conduct against Aaron Surina. It seems to be a motion for contempt hearing filed by Sirinya Surina, his presumed ex-spouse or partner. Further information about the nature of the contempt charges or the conduct of the court or other party would be necessary to identify any additional injustices against Mr. Surina. Nonetheless, the available evidence already indicates multiple potential instances of unfair treatment and possible misconduct against Aaron.
About The Author
