Document: ORDER
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/221.0 ORDER 2018-12-31 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2018-12-31
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The court documents reveal potential bias against Aaron Michael Surina, the respondent in the case. The court has hastily ordered to hear the petitioner Sirinya Surina’s Motion for Contempt, to make a ruling on the Community Property Character of the Family Residence, and to allow the petitioner to act as the sole representative of the community to manage and sell the family residence. The hearing is scheduled on a shortened timeline, without providing ample time for the respondent to prepare his case adequately.
This rush to judgment is portrayed as necessary to prevent irreversible damage to the petitioner and the community. However, this reasoning appears to side with the petitioner without considering the potential harm or unfairness to the respondent. The court decision does not seem to consider Aaron’s rights or his perspective regarding the family residence and its sale.
Furthermore, Aaron’s attorney, Richard K. Kuck, had to argue via telephone conference, which might have hindered his ability to represent Aaron fully. This lack of face-to-face interaction could have potentially affected the fairness of the hearing and the court’s judgment.
In summary, the court’s rush to expedite the case without considering Aaron’s rights or giving him adequate time to prepare his defense, coupled with the fact that his attorney had to argue via telephone, could be seen as biased and unjust towards him.
About The Author
