Document: ORDER AMENDING CASE SCHEDULE
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/226.0 ORDER AMENDING CASE SCHEDULE 2019-01-18 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2019-01-18
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The court document titled “Order Amending Case Schedule” in the case of Surina, Sirinya A (Petitioner) vs. Surina, Aaron M (Respondent) appears to demonstrate potential biases and unfairness against the father, Aaron Surina. The court has ordered him to comply with an amended schedule, which may not have considered his personal or professional commitments, potentially affecting his ability to fully participate in the proceedings.
Furthermore, the court has ordered both parties to attend mediation with a neutral third person either agreed to by the parties or ordered by the court. This could imply a bias if the court-appointed mediator favors the petitioner, Sirinya.
The document also indicates that failure to provide proof of mediation by the stipulated deadline could lead to sanctions. This could be seen as a pressure tactic, potentially forcing Aaron into a rushed mediation process without adequate preparation or consultation.
The court’s order was served to Aaron Surina’s attorney via email, which could be considered an impersonal and insufficient method of communication for such important matters. This could potentially disadvantage Aaron by not providing him with an adequate opportunity to respond or prepare.
Moreover, the court has mandated the disclosure of lay and expert witnesses, submission of a parenting plan, and financial declaration, among other things. These requirements could be perceived as invasive and burdensome, potentially violating Aaron’s privacy rights and placing an unfair burden on him.
In conclusion, the document seems to reflect a potentially biased and unfair conduct against Aaron Surina, the respondent father, in the court proceedings.
About The Author
