Document: DECLARATION AFFIDAVIT
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/227.0 DECLARATION AFFIDAVIT 2019-03-12 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2019-03-12
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Final Summary:
Aaron Surina, a father who has been subjected to multiple instances of unjust treatment and unethical conduct in the handling of his case, alleges that he was illegally denied access to his property since August 14, 2017. Surina believes he was the victim of false testimony by Keith Glanzer, leading to an unjustified exparte restraining order. This order resulted in Surina’s life being controlled by Carl Wilson, who allegedly manipulated a foreign immigrant through deception.
Surina further claims that he was forced to sign misrepresented documents under the threat of losing his children. He stands firm that he has not waived his right to recover damages or his property ownership rights. Accusations are made against Keith Glanzer for ignoring instructions to provide a list for Carl Wilson’s client, Sirinya Polarj, thereby depriving Surina of due process.
Moreover, Surina contends the court has signed orders based on misrepresented facts without due process or a proper hearing. His accusations against the court include being tricked by deceptive motions and ulterior agendas, including a motion to have Sirinya execute a sale of his property exclusively.
Surina also asserts he was unjustly compelled to sign the Purchase and Sale agreement under duress, with threats of his children being taken away. He criticizes Keith Glanzer for allegedly trying to have his friend control the GAL appointment and intentionally inflicting injury and extracting equity from the property.
Furthermore, Surina reports that he has been illegally removed from his property without any compensation or recognition of his titled rights as a property owner. He also alleges that he was denied human rights protections under RCW 49.60.2235 and was not afforded protection under the domestic violence prevention title 26.50.200.
The proceedings, as they are depicted in the document, do not adhere to the principles of fairness and due process, as Aaron was not given an opportunity to defend himself against the allegations. This is a clear injustice against Aaron and highlights unethical conduct in the proceedings.
In conclusion, Aaron Surina believes he has been a victim of significant injustices, judicial bias, unethical conduct, and a lack of proper representation. He feels that he has suffered injury, defamation, and financial loss due to the actions of the State of Washington and other parties involved in the case, causing him and his children undue suffering.
About The Author
