Document: TRIAL MINUTES
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/233.0 TRIAL MINUTES 2019-03-27 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2019-03-27
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The court documents reveal several possible points of unfairness towards the father, Aaron Surina. Firstly, it’s noteworthy that Aaron Surina was not physically present during the trial, and was represented by Richard Kuck who appeared telephonically. This might suggest that he was not provided an adequate chance to defend his interests in person.
The core issue discussed in this trial was the Petitioner’s Motion for the Conveyance of Real Estate, which presumably involves property rights. However, there is no indication that Aaron Surina was given an opportunity to argue his position or present evidence against this motion. The documents merely state that the respective counsels presented their arguments, without specifying what those arguments were or how they were received by the court.
Moreover, the exact ruling of the court is not specified in the document. Instead, it simply states that “The court rules as indicated on the record.” This lack of transparency makes it difficult for Aaron Surina (and others) to understand the reasoning behind the court’s decision.
In summary, Aaron Surina may have been denied a fair hearing due to his absence from the trial, lack of transparency in the court’s ruling, and the potential imbalance of representation in court. These factors could be seen as a form of judicial bias against him.
About The Author
