Document: EMAIL
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/234.0 EMAIL 2019-03-29 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2019-03-29
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The email correspondence reveals several instances of alleged unfairness and potential bias against Aaron Surina. Firstly, Aaron expresses his unwillingness to forfeit the American-side assets in their marital property settlement while his ex-wife retains the larger investment in Thailand. This situation seemingly imbalances the property division, as his ex-wife is the sole property owner in Thailand.
Secondly, Aaron highlights that they had previously agreed on a division of assets, for which they had signed legal instruments and made payments. However, he indicates that these assets are being intentionally diminished in America, as evidenced by a loss of $50,000 in rental revenue.
Thirdly, Aaron seems to be facing undue pressure to sign closing documents to correct a typographical error in an order signed by Judge Hazel. The order, which was signed over Aaron’s objection, permits his ex-wife to sign all documents and close the sale without his participation. This not only undermines his rights as a titled owner but also hints at judicial bias.
Lastly, Aaron raises concerns over Keith Glanzer’s involvement, suggesting that he might be targeting the title company after his interference in drafting the deed. Aaron insinuates that Keith’s motives for insisting on his ex-wife being listed as a seller may soon become apparent, hinting at potential unethical conduct.
About The Author
