Document: EMAIL
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/237.0 EMAIL 2019-03-29 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2019-03-29
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Combined Summary:
The court documents raise substantial concerns about potential bias and unethical conduct against Aaron Surina. Mr. Surina has expressed significant apprehension regarding possible fraudulent activity involving his property’s sale and mortgage payoff details, with an unaffiliated quality loan servicing company allegedly receiving a mysterious $229,000. He suspects this could be part of a sophisticated scam involving identity theft, unauthorized loan modifications, and a potential network of white-collar criminals.
Furthermore, Mr. Surina alleges that he has been systematically excluded from discussions concerning his property since September, suggesting a troubling lack of transparency and fairness. He accuses the court of enabling concealment, which could potentially signal fraudulent activities. The fact that he was denied the opportunity to counter these allegations with hard evidence implies a procedural bias that is deeply concerning.
His attempt to communicate his grievances directly to Judge Hazel was met with a reminder about the impropriety of ex parte communication, which Mr. Surina perceived as a restriction on his ability to seek justice. This situation could be interpreted as an indication of limited access to justice for him.
In addition to these issues, Mr. Surina asserts that he has lost numerous rights and assets and been burdened with more liabilities due to a hearing for which he claims he was never served process. This alleged lack of due process is particularly alarming. He also points to ineffective legal representation, which may have disadvantaged him in court. His property was ordered to be sold to pay for a Guardian ad Litem (GAL) to investigate allegations of neglect and violence against his children, a move he fears infringes on his property rights and enables potential fraud against him.
However, it’s crucial to note that the document provided lacks specific details about a court case, judicial decisions, or any actions that could be interpreted as biased or unfair against Aaron Surina. At this stage, without more context or details, it is challenging to identify or highlight any injustices or bias against him definitively. Yet, the seriousness of Aaron’s allegations indicate that further investigation into this matter is warranted.
About The Author
