Document: EMAIL
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/238.0 EMAIL 2019-03-29 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2019-03-29
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Document title: EMAIL
In a detailed summary of the case, Aaron Surina has raised significant concerns about perceived fraudulent activities, unethical conduct, and judicial bias related to his case. He asserts that the court has unfairly granted full control to individuals he accuses of committing felonious acts, thereby manipulating his property rights. This has resulted in him being unjustly denied access to his property, despite several ignored pleas to the FBI for help.
Surina has been unjustly removed from his home and separated from his children for 17 months, a situation he attributes to fraudulent activities. He believes himself to be a victim of “mortgage fraud,” which he links to erroneous documents that he has been trying to correct.
He further alleges that his rights have been violated due to overreach by the court. Despite being initially instructed that he could sign certain documents, he was subsequently denied the chance to do so, intensifying his suspicion of judicial bias against him. His direct efforts to report these issues to the court have been dismissed, with directions to stop sending emails, leaving him feeling unheard and victimized.
Surina contends with a complicated network of fraud, involving potential unethical conduct and judicial bias, which has resulted in notable injustices. He raises suspicion about his identity being used without his consent or knowledge to procure a loan on his property. He implicates individuals, particularly a group led by Keith, who he believes have unethically obtained documents related to a new loan issued in March.
He further points out the court’s repeated granting of concealment as an indicator of potential fraud. Surina has been excluded from the sale of his property since September, which he perceives as a lack of transparency and fairness.
Aaron Surina also expresses concerns about Mr. Glanzer’s actions, who he believes is attempting to fraudulently present the property as belonging to a person named Sirinya. Surina argues that his property owner rights have been violated due to his being denied the opportunity to counter Mr. Glanzer’s alleged deception with concrete evidence.
He also expresses frustration over losing his house in a hearing without being properly served, and the lack of follow-through by an attorney on crucial issues. He suspects that Judge Hazel has allowed fraudulent activities and identity theft, increasing his liability. Surina contends that he is unjustly burdened by the loss of more rights, assets, and the accumulation of more liabilities. Overall, he perceives himself as a victim of a complex web of fraud, unethical conduct, and potential judicial bias.
About The Author
