Document: JUDGMENT
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/239.0 JUDGMENT 2019-03-29 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2019-03-29
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Document Summary:
The court rulings in the case of Aaron Surina and Sirinya Surina, as recorded in the judgment, bear significant signs of bias against Mr. Surina. He was unjustifiably excluded from the decision-making process concerning the sale of the marital property, a family residence that was previously shared. Not only was Mr. Surina denied any involvement in the execution of sale-related documents, but he was also barred from making any contact with potential buyers or real estate professionals. This restriction seems unjust, as it undermines his rights as a co-owner of the property.
Furthermore, the court granted Mrs. Surina sole authority to complete the sale of the family residence. By doing so, the court unjustly singled out Mr. Surina and denied him his rightful involvement in the process. This decision suggests a clear bias and unethical conduct in the court’s order.
The court rulings also placed a potentially excessive financial burden on Mr. Surina by imposing a high yearly interest rate of 12% for child support, medical support, and children’s expenses. This rate seems excessive and could disproportionately impact Mr. Surina’s financial stability.
Moreover, the court also ordered Mr. Surina to cover $1,500 in attorney fees and costs. No detailed rationale was provided for this amount, indicating a lack of transparency in the court’s decision-making process and raising questions about the fairness of the judgment.
Overall, the court documents suggest an unjust treatment of Aaron Surina and favor Sirinya Surina unreasonably in terms of property rights and financial obligations, indicating potential misconduct by the attorneys and bias in the legal process.
About The Author
