Document: MOTION
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/245.0 MOTION 2019-04-15 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2019-04-15
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The court documents indicate some potential bias against Aaron Michael Surina. The motion filed by Sirinya Surina’s attorney, Keith A. Glanzer, requests the court to order a psychological evaluation for Mr. Surina, based on a previous court order. The motion appears to be influenced by the subjective opinion of Judge Patti Walker, who expressed concerns about Mr. Surina’s demeanor, labeling him as someone with “power and control issues”. This characterization, which seems to be drawn from a single interaction, could be seen as unfair and potentially biased.
Furthermore, Mr. Surina is accused of refusing to cooperate with the sale of the family residence causing three potential buyers to rescind their offers. However, the document does not provide any concrete evidence or context to back this claim. If the sales were lost due to disagreements between both parties, blaming Mr. Surina solely could be unjust.
Mr. Surina’s trip to Thailand is presented as an act of defiance without providing his side of the story or reasoning. If there are legal or personal explanations for his actions, the document’s representation could be an unfair portrayal. Lastly, the document claims Mr. Surina threatened Sirinya with false accusations of child abuse, but doesn’t provide any evidence to substantiate this claim, which could be seen as an attempt to damage Mr. Surina’s reputation unjustly.
In conclusion, the motion seems to be laden with bias and potentially unfair accusations against Mr. Surina, without providing proper evidence or his perspective on the matters. The use of a somewhat subjective evaluation by Judge Walker to justify a psychological test further points towards potential judicial bias against him.
About The Author
