Document: DECLARATION AFFIDAVIT
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/253.0 DECLARATION AFFIDAVIT 2019-04-23 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2019-04-23
Summary (Justice Demanded)
In the document titled “Declaration Affidavit,” Aaron Surina, the owner of the “Rocky Ridge” property, expresses grave concerns about potential bias against him and perceived unethical conduct. He reveals instances where decisions concerning his property were made without his knowledge or consent, including a secret court claim alleging his refusal to save his home from foreclosure. He was also excluded from selecting Spokane Title, the company responsible for his property’s title insurance. Additionally, the presence of Keith Glanzer at Tom Irish’s office, claiming to have a court order concerning community property, raises questions about the transparency of the legal proceedings.
The document reveals potential unfairness in the ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance on Aaron’s property. The document seems to require both Aaron and Sirinya Surina to execute the forthcoming deed with no clear explanation. Moreover, the document includes a wide range of general exceptions and reserves the right not to issue any endorsement, potentially leaving Aaron exposed to various claims and risks. It also includes a cancellation fee, which could be burdensome for Aaron if the transaction is cancelled.
Several points in the document cause concern from Aaron’s perspective. The imposition of a real estate excise tax on any sale of the property and general real estate taxes, due without flexibility or consideration for Aaron’s financial circumstances, can be financially burdensome. Furthermore, Aaron is held liable for any assessments by the City of Spokane Valley and Spokane County Water District No. 3 without clarity on potential costs. Additionally, a Deed of Trust outlines that Aaron is the grantor, with a mortgage amount of $237,500. These terms could potentially be unfavorable and further encumber his property.
The document suggests Aaron may be experiencing unfair treatment in the legal proceedings related to his dissolution of marriage. Specifically, a judgment entered against him in favor of Sirinya Surina for an amount of $1,000 could indicate bias or injustice. The assignment of the beneficial interest under a deed of trust without Aaron’s explicit consent could also be viewed as unethical. The appointment of a new trustee, Quality Loan Service Corporation of Washington, also raises questions about the fairness of the process.
Aaron raised a complaint regarding title and escrow issues, but the documents suggest a lack of communication or explanation. Aaron was not sent any documents to review, indicating a disregard for his rights to information about his case. This raises ethical concerns about the handling of his case and could potentially compromise the fairness of the legal process.
The documents reveal perceived injustices and potentially unethical conduct from Aaron’s perspective. He feels coerced into paying for legal counsel he cannot afford, suggesting an imbalance of power and financial strain. Instances such as Keith attending court proceedings without Aaron, asking only him to sign certain documents, and providing misleading information to Tom could indicate a lack of transparency and fairness in the process. Aaron also feels sidelined in the sale of his property, and the forced need to find a new place to live can be seen as an undue hardship imposed on him. All these collectively suggest a perceived bias against him, with his interests seemingly marginalized.
About The Author
