Document: DECLARATION AFFIDAVIT
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/260.0 DECLARATION AFFIDAVIT 2019-04-30 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2019-04-30
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Consolidated Summary:
A detailed review of several court documents related to a marital dispute and subsequent property transactions involving Aaron Surina has revealed potential instances of bias, unfair conduct, and unethical behavior. Mr. Surina is portrayed negatively, often unfairly, and without providing the full context or his side of the story.
This unjust portrayal begins with Realtor, Donna Henry’s contradictory statements about advising Mr. Surina to stop paying his mortgage and her allegations about his uncooperativeness in property negotiations. Further bias arises in a conversation between Denay Hornberger and Donna Henry, where Mr. Surina is improperly referred to as ‘crazy,’ which could influence the legal proceedings unfairly.
Moreover, private information about Mr. Surina was sought without his consent, an action that indicates potential bias and unethical conduct. The Residential Purchase and Sale Agreement, in which Mr. Surina is the seller, seems skewed against him. The agency disclosure suggests that the selling broker represents the buyer and not Mr. Surina, which could disadvantage him. The charges/assessments clause implies that any costs levied before but due after closing may be assumed by the buyer or prepaid by the seller, potentially burdening Mr. Surina unfairly.
While some documents, such as the Residential Purchase & Sale Agreement, seem standard, there are areas of potential concern. The agreement doesn’t specify who represented Mr. Surina during the negotiation process. Also, the handling of utilities and potential charges or assessments levied before but due after closing is left ambiguous, potentially imposing costs unfairly on Mr. Surina.
Without additional context or evidence, it’s challenging to ascertain injustices. However, given the instances of potential bias and unfair treatment presented, there’s a consistent theme of Mr. Surina being portrayed negatively and shouldered with disproportionate burdens. This forms a narrative of potential injustice and bias against Mr. Surina, who has been through more than anyone should have to go through while trying to protect his children.
Therefore, it is necessary to ensure that Mr. Surina’s rights and interests are duly protected, and all legal proceedings involving him are conducted in a fair, unbiased, and ethical manner.
About The Author
