Document: MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/263.0 MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 2019-05-02 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2019-05-02
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The court document under review is an unjust motion filed by Sirinya P. Surina against Aaron Michael Surina, the respondent and father in this case, accusing him of failing to comply with previous court orders. These accusations lack clarity, and there is no tangible evidence provided to support them, leading to an unfair presumption of guilt against Mr. Surina. The motion seeks to impose financial penalties on Mr. Surina, further undermining his financial stability. The document also appears to employ aggressive legal tactics, such as scheduling an ex parte hearing, denying Mr. Surina the right to defend himself and highlighting the unjust treatment he is experiencing.
The document reveals potential bias and unethical conduct in the handling of Mr. Surina’s home insurance policy and the sale of the family residence. Specifically, the attorney representing Ms. Surina forwarded a roof damage claim without Mr. Surina’s consent, disregarding his position as the named insured on the policy. The court has also named Ms. Surina the sole party responsible for selling the family residence, seemingly favoring her despite the ongoing dispute over their marital status.
Furthermore, Mr. Surina is being misrepresented as defiant for refusing to provide insurance information, possibly due to perceived unfair treatment. The court orders appear to disregard Mr. Surina’s financial hardship, as evidenced by his mortgage arrears.
Moreover, the motion for contempt filed against Mr. Surina is based on a subjective interpretation of the term “cooperation,” possibly imposing unfair conditions on him without clear justification or his consent. The confidentiality notice in the communication also appears to limit his rights and ability to seek external assistance, potentially infringing on his rights to fair representation.
Overall, this document reveals a series of potential biases and unethical conduct against Mr. Surina, with charges of non-cooperation and misrepresentation disregarding his rights and circumstances. This unfair treatment is a clear violation of his constitutional rights and undermines the integrity of the legal process.
About The Author
