Document: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/264.0 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 2019-05-02 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2019-05-02
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The court order issued against Aaron Michael Surina appears to be biased and unfair. The court approved a Motion for Contempt Hearing against him without providing a transparent explanation or clear grounds for such contempt. This action disregards the principles of fairness and due process.
Aaron was ordered to attend a court hearing, with an instruction to defend why he should not be found in contempt. Essentially, he was presumed guilty before being given an opportunity to defend himself, a clear violation of the presumption of innocence principle.
The order further threatens Aaron with the possibility of his arrest and approval of the other party’s requests without hearing his side if he fails to attend the hearing. This is a coercive tactic that uses intimidation to force his compliance, rather than allowing for a fair and balanced hearing process.
Moreover, the document does not specify the allegations that led to the contempt charge, which infringes on Aaron’s right to be fully informed about the charges against him. This lack of information hinders his ability to prepare an adequate defense.
Finally, the court order is presented by the attorney for the petitioner, suggesting a one-sided influence on the court’s decision making process. The impartiality of the court is questionable in this scenario, as it seems to favor the petitioner without taking into account Aaron’s version of events. In summary, the court documents reflect a bias against Aaron and a lack of ethical conduct in the proceedings.
About The Author
