Document: AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENDANT RESPONDENT
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/301.0 AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENDANT RESPONDENT 2019-06-18 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2019-06-18
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Consolidated Summary:
Aaron Surina’s experiences throughout his court proceedings suggest a pattern of significant judicial bias and potential unethical conduct from opposing attorneys, particularly Stanley Kempner and Keith Glanzer. Surina alleges that his rights as a father have been unfairly dismissed, and his concerns about his children’s welfare have been ignored or misrepresented.
Surina’s primary criticisms revolve around the conduct of Sirinya Surina’s attorney, Keith Glanzer, who Aaron claims has attempted to manipulate the system to his advantage, including attempts to sell Surina’s house without consent. Surina also alleges Glanzer has been inconsistent in his representation of Sirinya, presenting documents prepared by others as Sirinya’s wishes, a contradiction that Surina views as potentially misleading to the court.
An additional major concern is the granting of power of attorney to Carl Wilson, a move Surina warned Sirinya against, and which he believes puts her and their children at significant risk. Surina alleges that Wilson and others manipulated the court system to secure a dubious deed on a property, which he perceives as a calculated attempt to erase his presence in his children’s lives.
Surina also claims to have been a victim of physical abuse by Sirinya and feels his allegations of abuse and potential endangerment to their children’s health were dismissed or ignored by the court. There are also multiple instances where Surina was portrayed as an abusive and deceptive individual, and his attempts to protect his children were thwarted, which he finds deeply unfair.
In financial matters, Surina alleges potential unfairness in the drafting of a loan agreement involving his wife, Sirinya, which he claims puts undue financial pressure on him. He also claims he was not adequately represented or advised during the agreement’s drafting, which led to a biased outcome favoring his wife and the couple she owes money to.
Overall, Surina feels that the court proceedings have been riddled with injustices and marked by an unfair bias and unethical conduct from opposing counsel. He believes that his rights as a parent are being dismissed, his allegations of abuse are being ignored, and his attempts to protect his children are being thwarted. This perceived lack of fairness in the proceedings, coupled with the alleged unethical conduct by the attorneys representing Sirinya Surina or Carl Wilson, paints a picture of a man struggling to protect his children and his rights amidst a system he believes is stacked against him.
About The Author
