Document: ORDER
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/302.0 ORDER 2019-06-18 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2019-06-18
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The court documents indicate potentially unfair treatment towards Aaron Surina. Firstly, the court’s decision seems to be based on an unclear basis and lacks transparent reasoning. It appears that the court has moved to grant the opposing party’s request without providing a clear justification or evidence thereof. The court record indicates that sanctions were applied, but there is no clear indication as to why they were deemed necessary or justifiable.
Moreover, there is a mention of attorney fees being reasonable, but it does not provide any explanation or breakdown of these fees, which brings up questions about whether these were unfairly levied against Mr. Surina. The document also cryptically refers to Mr. Surina’s motion for contempt, asserting it is not in the court file and implying that it was mishandled or misplaced. This raises questions about the competence and fairness of the court’s administrative process.
Finally, the court’s order to quash an ex-parte restraining order without providing a detailed explanation can be perceived as an unfair decision, potentially putting Mr. Surina at a disadvantage. All these points suggest potential judicial bias and unethical conduct towards Mr. Surina.
About The Author
