Document: ORDER AMENDING CASE SCHEDULE
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/316.0 ORDER AMENDING CASE SCHEDULE 2019-06-28 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2019-06-28
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The document titled “Order Amending Case Schedule” outlines the revised schedule for the domestic case between Aaron M. Surina (the father) and Siriny A. Surina. From Aaron’s perspective, there are several potential areas of perceived bias and unfairness:
1. There is no explicit mention of whether both parties were consulted or agreed upon the revised schedule. If Aaron was not consulted, this could be seen as a denial of due process, potentially infringing on his rights to fair hearing.
2. The order demands all parties to attend mediation, which suggests the court’s presumption that an amicable resolution can be achieved through this method. However, if Aaron believes this process is ineffective or biased, this requirement might be seen as unfair.
3. The court has imposed a strict deadline for filing and serving trial management joint reports, which could put Aaron under unnecessary pressure, potentially impacting his ability to adequately prepare for the trial.
4. If Aaron was not given sufficient notice or time to respond to these changes, it may seem as if the court is favoring the petitioner and not providing him with a fair opportunity to present his case.
5. The document doesn’t provide any reasoning behind the changes in the schedule. Lack of transparency might make Aaron feel as if the court is acting without just cause, which can be perceived as unethical.
In summary, from Aaron’s perspective, this document could be seen to convey a sense of bias, lack of transparency, and potentially unfair treatment.
About The Author
