Document: FINANCIAL DECLARATION OF RESP
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/32.0 FINANCIAL DECLARATION OF RESP 2017-09-15 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2017-09-15
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The court documents fail to provide a comprehensive and unbiased representation of Aaron Surina’s financial situation, leading to potential injustices and unethical conduct. Mr. Surina’s gross monthly income is $8,719, and after deductions, his net income stands at $6,873. His monthly expenses post-separation, however, amount to $6,697.92 plus $268 for other debt payments, leaving him with very little financial cushion. Despite this, the document does not detail any child support or spousal maintenance paid or received by Mr. Surina, potentially indicating an oversight or unethical conduct.
The document’s format and presentation do not allow for a thorough examination or dispute of the other party’s income statements, potentially leading to inaccuracies or misrepresentations that may negatively impact Mr. Surina. On top of this, the document demands a detailed list of liquid assets without considering any outstanding debts, potentially overestimating Mr. Surina’s financial capabilities.
The expenses listed, including housing at $2,643 and total children’s expenses at $1,844, appear excessive and potentially inflated, with no opportunity to dispute these costs provided. Furthermore, the document fails to take into account the other adult’s gross income in the household, leading to a skewed financial picture and an undue burden on Mr. Surina.
The documents also reveal an enormous financial burden on Mr. Surina, who seems to carry a disproportionate amount of financial responsibility. He has a mortgage of $227,630.00, an auto loan of $12,951.64, and credit card debts totaling $9,041, on top of his personal expenses, hinting at significant financial strain. The court’s failure to consider these burdens when allocating financial responsibilities, coupled with the absence of a comparative analysis of the mother’s financial state, raises serious concerns about potential bias and lack of fairness.
Moreover, these documents highlight significant legal fees amounting to $6,000, which Mr. Surina had to pay using credit cards. The lack of transparency and consideration for his financial hardship may suggest possible bias or unfair treatment in the legal process.
In conclusion, these court documents reveal several areas of potential bias, unfairness, and possible unethical conduct against Aaron Surina, potentially leading to an unjust resolution of his case.
About The Author
