Document: PROPOSED PARENTING PLAN
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/322.0 PROPOSED PARENTING PLAN 2019-08-02 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2019-08-02
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The comprehensive summary of the Proposed Parenting Plan reveals numerous potential instances of bias, unfairness, and restriction of Aaron Surina’s rights as a father. This document, which isn’t a court order, includes unfounded allegations of child abuse and anger management issues, which have been used to limit Aaron’s decision-making rights and parental role.
The plan mandates a rigid 50/50 time split between parents and imposes a disproportionate burden on Aaron, who is solely accountable for child transportation and has limited flexibility in adapting to changing circumstances. It also imposes a potentially unfair scheduling system that does not adequately consider his needs as a father, making it inconvenient and stressful for him.
The plan also seems to favor the mother’s schedule and convenience, including the distribution of holidays and special weekends. Aaron’s right to celebrate birthdays and events with his children is restricted, and he is relegated to secondary priority. The plan also seems to prioritize the mother’s family relationships over his.
The document indicates potential biases in the decision-making process, particularly around the relocation stipulations and dispute resolution procedures. Aaron is expected to bear undue financial burdens, such as legal fees and mediation costs, without providing him with an adequate opportunity to object or contest.
The plan also appears to violate Aaron’s privacy rights, as it discloses his personal health information to numerous parties. In addition, the document includes a provision for the release of a claim to exemption for his child, Andrew Surina, for tax years 2018 and 2019, which could increase his tax liability.
The plan also seems to restrict Aaron’s rights in making healthcare decisions for his child, limiting his access to his children, and invading his privacy. The plan, proposed under penalty of perjury, suggests that Aaron is being coerced into agreeing with a plan that might not be in his best interests.
Overall, the Proposed Parenting Plan seems to be heavily skewed in favor of the mother, indicating a potential bias against Aaron Surina. The plan doesn’t seem to adequately consider his rights and needs as a father, leading to a perception of unfairness. The lack of transparency and consideration for Aaron’s rights raises concerns about potential injustices and unethical conduct in the process.
About The Author
