Document: JOINT STATUS REPORT
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/333.0 JOINT STATUS REPORT 2019-09-03 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2019-09-03
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Comprehensive Summary:
The court documents relating to Aaron Surina’s case reveal numerous instances of potential unfairness, bias, and unethical conduct, primarily focusing on disputes between Aaron and his ex-wife Sirinya Surina. Several key issues, including the parenting plan, property division, child support, and attorney fees, are disputed, raising questions about the adequacy of Aaron’s rights and interests consideration during preliminary discussions.
The lack of a pre-trial meeting, despite it being required, may have denied Aaron the opportunity to settle some issues outside of court. The exhibits listed for the trial, such as Aaron’s earning statement, tax returns, social media posts, medical records, and sheriff reports, could potentially invade his privacy and paint him unfairly as a difficult and provocative litigant.
The imbalance in witness representation, with all listed witnesses being called by the petitioner and none set to testify on behalf of Aaron, suggests a potential bias in the proceedings. The potential imposition of monetary sanctions or exclusion of evidence if required documentation is not provided could disadvantage Aaron if not applied equitably to both parties.
Aaron accuses the court of several instances of unfairness, including allegations of domestic violence and child abandonment, exploitation of his situation as a pro-se litigant, unjust restriction of his property and investments, and lack of transparency regarding the sale of separate property. He also alleges incidents of fraud, such as being forced to sign off on a $229,000 loan, and accuses the court of child endangerment by placing his children in a harmful living situation.
Aaron strongly disagrees with the proposed parenting plan, as he feels his rights to healthcare, custody, control, and companionship of his children are being unjustly taken away. He disputes the accuracy of the child support worksheet and is concerned about the classification of certain properties and assets. He raises objections about charges from a case he claims is not his and fees he is being inaccurately charged for. He also alleges fraudulent actions against his property by his ex-wife and others.
There are instances of potential unethical conduct, including case trickery, obstruction of justice, contempt orders, custodial interference, refusal to answer questions during interrogations, and potential title fraud. Aaron alleges Keith Glanzer obtained all possessions illegally and caused interference that led to the drafting of community property closing documents, suggesting mortgage fraud and mail forwarding fraud.
Aaron appears to be consistently denied transparency and obstructed from maintaining contact with his children. He was accused without convincing evidence of any kind of irreparable harm, implying a potential misuse of authority or bias against him. The court documents suggest a potential financial disparity and violation of his rights, with Aaron making regular contributions to his ex-wife’s requirements and a misunderstanding about tax filing.
The court documents also indicate attempted creation of community property without a court order, suggesting an unlawful action that could compromise Surina’s rights. Surina seems to have been burdened with costs he couldn’t afford and may have been coerced into accepting false information. There is a mention of a protection order granted to keep Carl Wilson away from Surina’s sons, later challenged by a team of lawyer friends of Keith who allegedly lied under oath.
In summary, the documents portray a narrative of apparent unethical conduct, potential judicial bias, and a series of injustices against Aaron Surina in his legal proceedings. However, without further details, a more concrete analysis cannot be provided.
About The Author
