Document: JOINT STATUS REPORT
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/335.0 JOINT STATUS REPORT 2019-11-27 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2019-11-27
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Unified Summary
Aaron Surina, the respondent in this case, asserts that he has suffered numerous injustices, unethical conduct, and bias throughout the court proceedings. He alleges that he has paid a disproportionate amount of his income for nearly two years, resulting in an overpayment of approximately $33,000-$36,000. He argues that these financial burdens have led to his financial ruin, destruction of his business, and loss of assets.
Mr. Surina raises serious questions about the conduct of his ex-wife, Sirinya, and third parties such as Carl Wilson and Keith Glanzer. He accuses them of exploiting the divorce proceedings for financial gain, committing fraud on the court, and manipulating Sirinya into not negotiating. Notably, he alleges that Glanzer orchestrated the dissolution of their marriage, leading to his unfair removal from his property and business.
He strongly disputes the court’s rulings, including the calculation of financial orders, the legality of “community expenses”, and the decision to remove him from his sole property. Additionally, he alleges a series of fraudulent activities, including Sirinya’s multiple birth certificates with different dates and locations of birth, a hidden property in Thailand, and theft of his personal property.
Aaron also contends that the court has overlooked certain facts regarding finances which has resulted in the need to sell his house to pay for a Guardian Ad Litem. Moreover, he asserts that his children have been denied their right to healthcare despite a court order, and their decisions are being made without his involvement by 34 parties, which he views as an abduction.
Furthermore, he criticizes Sirinya’s parenting, suggesting she lacks empathy and the desire to nurture, leading to a weak emotional bond with their children. He also argues that he was the victim of domestic violence and perceives the continuation of the case as gender discrimination.
Mr. Surina also disputes the validity of all CR11 sanctions, suggesting possible judicial bias or misconduct. He seeks the court’s protection from the alleged criminal activity of the Petitioner and other legal, financial, and other liabilities resulting from the dissolution and a false Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) filed by the Petitioner.
Overall, he believes that the division of assets and liabilities has been unjust, particularly with the imposition of a significant amount of debt on him, negatively affecting his net worth. Aaron Surina contends that he has suffered grave injustices, bias, and unethical conduct, impacting his financial stability, living conditions, and the relationship with his children. He seeks immediate reimbursement and corrective action to rectify these perceived wrongs.
About The Author
