Document: COPY
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/340.0 COPY 2019-12-20 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2019-12-20
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Document title: COPY
The document reveals a worrying pattern of potential bias, unfair treatment, and possible unethical conduct against Aaron Surina in the context of Washington state family law and constitutional law. Despite numerous actions taken against him, including sanctions for costs, the court denied Aaron’s request to be declared a vexatious litigator. This suggests his efforts to defend himself were viewed unfavorably, possibly limiting his access to justice.
The document further highlights that Aaron was unjustly burdened with unsatisfied judgments totaling $33,044.21. Even Judge Price noted the unfairness of these sanctions but lacked the authority to modify them. This situation underscores the systemic bias against Aaron, as his pleas for fairness were acknowledged yet dismissed due to the constraints of the judicial system.
The division of assets, particularly from the sale of the Rocky Ridge Home and savings from health and retirement accounts, seemed to be skewed against Aaron. Despite the court’s ruling for equal division, he received a lower sum due to the unjust judgments. This resulted in a financial advantage for Sirinya Surina, despite both parties being entitled to an equal share of the total assets.
The court’s denial of spousal maintenance to Sirinya based on Aaron’s inability to pay highlights the unjust financial burden he is shouldering. Despite being a short-term marriage without extravagance, Aaron is being financially penalized, which further illustrates the unfair treatment he is receiving.
The document also pertains to a denied request by Aaron in relation to a case involving Community Waste, which raises additional concerns of potential bias and unfairness. The lack of specific reasons or explanations for this decision suggests a lack of transparency that could be perceived as unethical. This leaves Aaron unjustly affected without a proper understanding of the reasons for the refusal, potentially endangering his rights and interests.
In conclusion, the document indicates a clear bias against Aaron Surina, as he bears disproportionate financial burdens and judgments, and his attempts to seek justice are unjustly labeled as vexatious. This raises serious concerns about the fairness and impartiality of the proceedings, as well as potential unethical conduct by attorneys Stanley Kempner, Keith Glanzer, or anyone representing Sirinya Surina, Carl Wilson, or Keith Glanzer.
About The Author
