Document: CHILD SUPPORT WORKSHEET PROPOSED
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/343.0 CHILD SUPPORT WORKSHEET PROPOSED 2019-12-20 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2019-12-20
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Document title: CHILD SUPPORT WORKSHEET PROPOSED
Summary:
The Child Support Worksheet Proposed reveals a potentially unjust financial burden on Aaron Michael Surina. Despite Aaron’s substantial monthly deductions, including federal and state income taxes, FICA, state industrial insurance deductions, and compulsory pension plan payments, he is still mandated to pay an excessively high amount of child support.
The document imputes a significant portion of Sirinya Surina’s wages and salaries, inflating her income to $8,409.08, thereby inaccurately representing her financial capability. Despite her imputed gross monthly income being significantly lower than Aaron’s, the document neglects to consider Sirinya’s low-income limitations. The basic child support obligation calculation appears biased, requiring Aaron to pay $1,466.68 while Sirinya’s obligation is a mere $507.32.
Additionally, the document fails to account for Sirinya’s contribution towards healthcare, day care, and special child-rearing expenses. This absence places an undue financial burden on Aaron which could reflect judicial bias or unethical conduct, potentially detrimental to their children’s long-term well-being.
Aaron’s disproportionately high gross child support obligation of $1,466.68, compared to Sirinya’s $507.32, raises questions about transparency and fairness. Similarly, the calculation of Aaron’s net income at $2,793.63 and Sirinya’s at $964.97, alongside a basic support obligation of $366.67 for Aaron and $126.83 for Sirinya, lacks clear justification, suggesting potential bias against Aaron.
The document also fails to provide clarity on household assets, debts, and other household income, including whether the incomes of current spouses, domestic partners, other adults in the household, or income from overtime or second jobs have been factored in. This raises questions about the comprehensive consideration of financial resources.
In summary, this document reveals potential discrepancies in the child support obligations’ calculation, possible unethical conduct, and potential bias against Aaron Surina, given the significant disparity in financial obligations and lack of transparency.
About The Author
