Document: CHILD SUPPORT WORKSHEET PROPOSED
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/344.0 CHILD SUPPORT WORKSHEET PROPOSED 2019-12-20 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2019-12-20
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Final Summary:
The proposed child support worksheet for Aaron Michael Surina, father of David Michael Surina (7 years old) and Andrew Alex Surina (3 years old), appears to indicate potential bias and lack of transparency that unfairly burdens Aaron. The calculation of each parent’s basic child support obligation seems disproportionate; despite Aaron’s income being roughly three times that of the children’s mother, Sirinya P. Surina, his child support obligation is nearly triple at $1,466.68 versus Sirinya’s $507.32. This discrepancy fails to consider the proportionality of their incomes, placing an unjust burden on Aaron.
The calculation also neglects to consider low-income limitations, which may apply given Sirinya’s significantly lower income. This could indicate a bias against Aaron in the court’s determination of child support obligations. Moreover, the document does not specify any contribution from Sirinya towards the monthly healthcare expenses for the children, leaving Aaron solely burdened with these costs. This lack of financial responsibility on Sirinya’s part suggests an imbalance in the court’s handling of the case.
Furthermore, the worksheet lacks clarity in key areas. The processes behind determining each parent’s net income and basic support obligation are unclear, limiting Aaron’s ability to fully understand and challenge these calculations—an issue that could be perceived as unethical. The document also omits details on the household assets, debts of each parent, and the income of other adults in the household, potentially concealing factors that could influence Aaron’s ability to meet the assigned child support obligation.
Lastly, the worksheet does not specify any ‘Other Factors For Consideration’ that could affect the fairness of the child support calculation. This oversight could be seen as bias, as it disregards unique circumstances that might warrant a reduction in Aaron’s child support obligation.
In conclusion, the child support worksheet as proposed displays potential bias against Aaron, lacks transparency, and seemingly fails to consider his financial circumstances fully. These factors collectively contribute to an environment where Aaron Surina may feel unfairly targeted and overly burdened.
About The Author
