Document: CHILD SUPPORT WORKSHEET
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/350.0 CHILD SUPPORT WORKSHEET 2019-12-20 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2019-12-20
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Integrated Summary:
The child support worksheet pertaining to the case of Aaron Surina reveals several instances of perceived bias and potential unfairness against him. Firstly, the tax rates applied to the mother’s and father’s incomes show a stark disparity, with the father’s income being taxed at double the rate of the mother’s, despite his higher monthly income. This could be perceived as unjust and biased.
The transparency of the document is questionable as it does not disclose information about the mother’s deductions, such as voluntary retirement contributions, while it declares these for the father. This lack of balanced disclosure could imply unethical conduct as it fails to provide a fair representation of both parties’ financial situations.
Moreover, the document omits critical information concerning the father’s expenses such as healthcare and special child-rearing costs. This omission, which may impact his ability to pay child support, could be construed as a lack of consideration for the father’s financial obligations and therefore potentially unfair.
The calculation of the father’s basic child support obligation is significantly higher than the mother’s, without any clear justification provided. This could be seen as placing an undue financial burden on Aaron, especially if the calculation isn’t based on a fair assessment of both parents’ incomes and expenses. Thereby, it could be seen as inherently biased.
The document also lacks detailed information on Aaron’s financial situation, household assets, debts, and income. Additionally, the child support payment expected from Aaron is considerably higher than the mother’s share, exacerbating the perceived bias when the parents’ financial situations are not clearly understood. Furthermore, the document does not account for Aaron’s monthly healthcare expenses, daycare and special expenses, or other ordinary expenses, potentially leading to an unjust financial strain on him.
Lastly, the document does not consider income from other adults in the household, child support, assistance programs, and other sources. This omission could lead to an overestimation of Aaron’s financial capabilities, further intensifying the perceived bias against him.
In conclusion, the child support worksheet, from Aaron Surina’s perspective, reflects considerable bias and potential unfairness against him due to disparities in treatment, lack of transparency, and possibly unethical conduct in the financial calculations.
About The Author
