Document: AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENDANT RESPONDENT
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/361.0 AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENDANT RESPONDENT 2020-03-09 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2020-03-09
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Document title: AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENDANT RESPONDENT
The document outlines an extensive series of alleged injustices and unethical conduct suffered by Aaron Surina in the handling of his case concerning a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) and other matters involving his children. Aaron feels he has been unfairly treated by the court, with a biased application of the law and unethical conduct by opposing parties.
Aaron alleges that the handling of the QDRO contradicts Judge Price’s confirmation, with an unfair version insisted upon by a third party that exceeds 100% before fees. This has resulted in an increase of $2000, which Aaron perceives as unethical. He also expresses concern that he is being unethically pressured into accepting this new version against his will, which has led to unnecessary court appearances and financial loss. He requests the court to consider his lost wages, which he estimates to be closer to $650 per day.
Aaron also claims that his children are unjustly being denied the fundamental right to communicate with him, thereby creating an unfair bias against him. He appeals for the removal of injunctions preventing his children from reaching out to him when distressed. He also expresses concern over the safety of his two sons, who are included in an AirBNB package, and requests immediate court intervention. He further requests the judge to communicate directly with his oldest son, who is confused and hurt by the court’s rulings.
Moreover, Aaron alleges that his children have been denied their right to healthcare, with over 60 counseling sessions being missed, which he believes is causing further harm to them. He also suggests that both parties should have the right to seek independent counsel and join as a single party for economical and case-related advantages.
Aaron also alleges that his separate property is being unjustly used to pay for his ex-wife’s Guardian ad Litem (GAL) fees, despite her qualifying for Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA) and volunteer GALs. He expresses concern over his children being forced into unfamiliar environments with adults and questions the financial motivations behind these arrangements.
Aaron contends that he has not had a single hearing in his favor and has not received any assets or property from the divorce settlement. He asserts that he alone is being forced to pay all the community debt and was not awarded any of his own labor. He also accuses the petitioner of identity theft and claims she has gained unauthorized access to his retirement account. Aaron believes his rights as an American citizen have been violated, and his assets have been taken away through the abuse of civil process.
Overall, Aaron Surina feels that he is experiencing significant injustice, unethical conduct by attorneys, particularly Stanley Kempner and Keith Glanzer, and judicial bias in these proceedings. His plea for justice extends to his children’s rights and well-being, which he believes are being compromised by the current proceedings. He requests the court to address these issues promptly to rectify the injustices and biases he and his children are experiencing.
About The Author
