Document: MOTION
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/362.0 MOTION 2020-03-09 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2020-03-09
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Comprehensive Summary:
Aaron Surina, the father of David and Andrew Surina, has raised serious concerns about perceived instances of unfairness and unethical conduct in his ongoing legal proceedings. He has challenged the handling of the Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO), raising allegations of manipulation and financial exploitation. Despite a prior agreement confirmed by Judge Price, he is being asked to pay an additional $2000, an action he sees as unjust.
Further exacerbating the situation, Mr. Surina claims the original QDRO hasn’t been submitted, leading him to feel coerced into signing a revised version that he believes is biased towards the petitioner. He also reports losses in wages due to frequent court appearances, often for what he perceives as trivial matters, costing him over $600 per day in lost wages and PTO.
His concerns extend to the wellbeing of his children. He finds it unacceptable that his children are included in an AirBNB package and has requested protective measures against such arrangements. He also alleges a lack of consideration for his children’s perspectives by the court, arguing that decisions significantly impacting them are being made without their consultation. Critically, Mr. Surina points out that his children’s right to healthcare, specifically counseling, has been denied, with over 60 sessions missed.
Mr. Surina faces restrictions on his communication with his children, a situation he believes is causing them fear and harm. He also criticizes the gag order that prevents him from openly discussing these concerns.
Moreover, he claims an unfair financial burden, having been held liable for all community debt without receiving any assets or property from his separate home. He believes this to be a form of human trafficking, as he is forced to service extensive debt without compensation for his labor.
Mr. Surina also accuses the petitioner of identity theft and unauthorized access to his retirement account, further sinking him into debt due to court-ordered obligations that were disregarded and reassigned to him.
He alleges that his separate property was unjustly used to pay for Ms. Surina’s Guardian ad Litem, keeping Ms. Polarj uninformed of her legal rights. He calls for the suspension of the statute of limitations to seek independent counsel, arguing for the right of both parties to unify for economic and case-related advantages.
In essence, Mr. Surina feels his rights as an American citizen have been compromised, his assets wrongfully seized, and his case mishandled through an abuse of the civil process. He advocates for experienced oversight and remediation to rectify the numerous perceived injustices he and his children have endured in this process.
About The Author
