Document: TRIAL MINUTES
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/381.0 TRIAL MINUTES 2020-06-19 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2020-06-19
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The court documents reveal a procedural hearing for the case of Surina, where both parties were present, and each represented themselves (Pro Se). Aaron Surina, the father, may perceive bias or unfairness due to a few key issues.
Firstly, the petitioner’s access to a Thai interpreter, while necessary for fair communication, could potentially introduce a bias. If the quality of interpretation was subpar or favored the petitioner, it could lead to a misunderstanding or misrepresentation of the father’s position.
Secondly, the court’s decision was made based on the arguments presented by both parties. However, the document does not provide any details about the arguments or how the court evaluated them. Aaron may feel that his arguments were not given equal weight or consideration as compared to the petitioner’s, indicating possible bias.
Lastly, the court ruled ‘as indicated on the record’, but does not provide any specifics on the ruling or reasoning. This lack of transparency may lead Aaron to question the fairness of the judgment.
Overall, while the document does not directly show any bias, it raises concerns about potential unfairness due to lack of transparency and the possible influence of the interpreter.
About The Author
