Document: NOTICE OF HEARING
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/396.0 NOTICE OF HEARING 2020-09-17 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2020-09-17
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The Notice of Hearing document does not present any explicit evidence of unfairness, unethical conduct, or judicial bias against Aaron Surina. However, from the father’s perspective, certain elements could potentially be seen as unfair.
The court hearing has been scheduled without providing a clear explanation about the purpose, which might lead to an interpretation of lack of transparency. The vague language “Amendment Nip pro thax Z” is not clearly explained, which could be seen as an instance of unfairness.
Mr. Surina is also warned that if he does not attend the hearing, the court may sign orders without hearing his side. This could be perceived as a threat and a coercive tactic, potentially compromising his right to a fair hearing.
Moreover, the hearing is requested by the petitioner or their lawyer, Sirinya Polar (Surina), rather than Mr. Surina or his lawyer. This might imply that the hearing’s agenda is driven by the petitioner’s interests rather than being a neutral process.
It’s important to note that these points are interpretations and do not necessarily indicate actual bias or unethical conduct. The specifics of the case, the local jurisdiction’s rules, and the conduct of all parties involved also play a key role in determining fairness and ethics.
About The Author
