Document: FINANCIAL DECLARATION OF PET
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/4.0 FINANCIAL DECLARATION OF PET 2017-08-14 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2017-08-14
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The financial declaration document reveals a significant disparity in the financial conditions of Aaron Surina and his ex-spouse, Siriniya Surina. Despite Aaron’s higher income of $9,167 per month, compared to Siriniya’s imputed income of $1,906 per month, the document neglects to account for his substantial monthly deductions like income taxes and FICA. Consequently, his gross income is used as a basis for potential financial obligations, unjustly burdening him.
Furthermore, the document does not adequately represent Aaron’s expenses and other financial obligations nor does it account for Siriniya’s additional sources of income, if any. This lack of comprehensive information could potentially bias the court’s decisions, leading to an unjust outcome for Aaron.
Additionally, the document does not detail Aaron’s available assets or provide a clear allocation of the expenses incurred after separation. This ambiguity could result in Aaron being unfairly saddled with financial obligations that he may not be responsible for, highlighting potential bias against him.
Aaron’s financial strain is further evidenced by the fact that he had to resort to borrowing to cover his legal fees. The lack of support and fairness in the legal proceedings is concerning, suggesting unethical conduct on the part of the legal system. The absence of information about the other party’s financial obligations further exacerbates the perceived bias in the proceedings.
The document, despite being a generic financial declaration form instruction, does not address specific injustices or biases against Aaron. While it explains the process of serving financial records, it fails to provide specific details about Aaron’s case, preventing a comprehensive and fair assessment.
In conclusion, the financial declaration appears to place an undue financial burden on Aaron Surina, suggesting potential biases, injustices, and unethical conduct, chiefly on the part of attorneys Stanley Kempner, Keith Glanzer, or anyone representing Sirinya Surina, Carl Wilson, or Keith Glanzer. To ensure a fair judgement, a more comprehensive and detailed financial assessment is needed.
About The Author
