Document: AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENDANT RESPONDENT
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/400.0 AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENDANT RESPONDENT 2020-09-23 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2020-09-23
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Document title: AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENDANT RESPONDENT
The court documents consolidate the grievances of Aaron Surina, a father who feels unjustly treated by both the U.S. legal system and government. Surina asserts that he was unwillingly made a beneficiary of governmental trusts and contracts without his informed consent or understanding. This, he argues, constitutes constructive fraud and a violation of his Christian faith, which doesn’t permit him to take oaths other than to God.
He further argues that his enrollment into the Social Security system was carried out under coercion, and at a time when he was not of legal age. This, he believes, amounts to an infringement on his inherent rights as a free inhabitant of Idaho and the United States.
Surina contends that the complex and ambiguous nature of the U.S. legal system has led to erroneous assumptions about his U.S. residence and citizenship status, based on documents he previously filed. He believes that he has been a victim of constructive fraud and misrepresentation, which led to the revocation of his rights through various applications and oaths, seen by him as traps due to withheld material facts.
Surina maintains that he has never intentionally relinquished any of his constitutionally secured, God-given rights. He rejects all benefits of the Uniform Commercial Code, absent a valid commercial agreement in which he is a party, and accuses government agencies of acting unethically by compelling him to accept the liability of unrevealed commercial agreements.
He alleges this to be an infringement on his common law right not to be compelled to perform under any contract or commercial agreement he did not knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally enter. He views this as judicial bias and an infringement of his rights, causing him to suffer loss under the doctrines of Laches, Waiver, or Estoppel.
Surina also asserts his belief that he is a victim of a massive fiscal fraud. He sees this as an unethical attempt to deceive and confuse him, involving sophistry and obfuscation. He demands proof of jurisdiction from any agency, corporation, or business claiming authority over him, providing a ten-day window for them to do so or lose any legal claim over him, as per the legal maxim “He who remains silent, consents”.
Surina reserves his rights to amend his Affidavit as new facts are revealed to him, suggesting that he believes he is being unjustly controlled or manipulated under an assumed jurisdiction. He allows for any statements or claims made in his Affidavit to be rebutted by facts of law or an overriding Supreme Court ruling, possibly indicating his concern that his rights to a fair trial or lawful representation may be compromised or disrespected.
In essence, Surina perceives a profound sense of injustice and bias in the legal system and government’s actions that have forced him into agreements, contracts, and systems without his fully informed consent or understanding. He feels that his rights are being violated, and these actions are unethical and biased against him.
About The Author
