Document: MOTION
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/401.0 MOTION 2020-09-23 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2020-09-23
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The document reveals a series of alleged injustices and unethical conduct in Aaron Surina’s case. Aaron, a self-represented litigant, alleges that the court committed several violations against him, including his 5th amendment rights and unethical conduct, throughout his divorce proceedings. He contests that his property rights were denied arbitrarily, his property unjustifiably seized and sold, and that he was coerced into signing a restraining order under duress.
He contends that he was forced into financial hardship due to the court’s decision to sell his property and cover the costs of a Guardian Ad Litem (GAL) for an indigent petitioner, despite the fact that community property was legislated out of law in Washington state in 2008. Furthermore, he was subjected to over $30,000 in attorney’s fees and sanctions based on what he believes to be fraudulent assumptions about property ownership.
Aaron’s right to access justice appears to be impeded by the court’s decision to delay the start of the statute of limitations. His access to his children was reportedly revoked based on hearsay evidence from his counsel, a move he believes was unfair. He also alleges that the court overlooked instances of physical and sexual abuse against his children by third parties with vested interests in the case.
Aaron points out legal errors and irregularities in the process, such as a denial letter without correcting QDRO as outlined, and judgement documents showing clerical errors for motion denied by Judge Hazel. He alleges that high-ranking members of the WA state Bar are implicated in the abuse of his children, suggesting that the court is protecting those involved rather than prioritizing the safety and wellbeing of the children.
He also alleges that the Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS) manipulated outcomes of children’s placement in Spokane County court cases through financial incentives, influencing the court’s decisions in favor of more child support enforcement orders. Despite being divorced for two years, the petitioner allegedly continues to engage in financial swindles, causing hardship to Aaron and others.
Overall, Aaron Surina believes that he has been subjected to severe injustices, unethical conduct, and bias throughout these court proceedings, with unethical conduct by the petitioner and potential misconduct in the handling of legal documents and rulings. He pleads for these clerical errors to be corrected and for a fair and just resolution to be reached.
About The Author
