Document: ORDER
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/403.0 ORDER 2020-09-29 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2020-09-29
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The court order contains several points of potential concern to Aaron Surina, the respondent, which may suggest unfairness or bias. Firstly, there seems to be a lack of consideration given to the respondent’s perspective, as the court apparently moved forward primarily based on the petitioner’s motion.
Aaron Surina may also find it problematic that his objections or attempts to address technical deficiencies were dismissed without a detailed explanation. This could potentially violate his right to a fair hearing, as it leaves little room for him to defend his interests.
Additionally, the court’s decision to adhere strictly to Judge Pres’s previous rulings and Fidelity’s requirements, without providing a thorough justification, might seem biased. The document does not provide any information on why Judge Pres’s ruling was seen as the ultimate authority, leaving Aaron Surina in a potentially disadvantaged position.
Finally, the lack of clear and concise language in the document could be seen as an effort to obfuscate the proceedings and decisions, which is arguably unethical. This lack of transparency could prevent Aaron from fully understanding the proceedings and implications, further hampering his ability to defend his interests.
About The Author
