Document: MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/407.0 MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 2020-10-21 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2020-10-21
Summary (Justice Demanded)
Comprehensive Summary:
According to the court documents, Aaron Surina, the father involved in the Surina Dissolution case, appears to be subjected to potentially unjust treatment and bias. Crucially, the other party, Sirinya Polarj, has been repeatedly in violation of court orders, including those regarding healthcare insurance provision for the children and the splitting of out-of-pocket medical expenses based on child support worksheets. There are multiple instances of custodial interference leading to an unstable environment for the children. This consistent disregard for court orders not only undermines the court’s authority but also infringes on Aaron Surina’s rights and the wellbeing of his children.
The court documents also highlight alleged unethical conduct by the mother, including reports of trespassing, screaming, and attempts to lure the children into her car, which have created an unstable environment for the children. She is also reported to be rationing food, limiting the children’s access to necessary nutrition, further exacerbating the children’s situation.
Furthermore, the documents reveal possible bias within the Spokane County Superior Court, with Surina alleging a conflict of interest and potential bias against him. This conflict arises from the Court’s involvement in a federal lawsuit where Surina has named it as a defendant due to the perceived harm and losses inflicted upon him and his children. Surina has been forced to request a change of venue to a neutral court in a neighboring county, suggesting a lack of fairness in the current proceedings.
The documents titled ‘Motion for Order to Show Cause’ are marked by ambiguity, potentially undermining Surina’s right to due process. The motion lacks a proposed order and fails to provide details about a Contempt Hearing Order, leaving related fields blank. The document ambiguously states that support orders might not have been obeyed, without specifying who is at fault. This vague language could be misused to unfairly blame Surina for non-compliance, even in the absence of concrete evidence.
Lastly, the documents suggest potential civil penalties for violation of a parenting/custody order and possible jail time, although it’s unclear if Surina has violated any such orders. The documents also hint at a financial strain on Surina, with various financial responsibilities, including child support, medical support, children’s expenses, spousal support, and potentially lawyer fees, all carrying an interest rate of 12%.
In conclusion, the court documents suggest a system that has failed to protect Aaron Surina’s rights and the wellbeing of his children. They hint at potential judicial bias, unethical conduct, financial burden, lack of transparency, potential bias, and possibly unjust penalties that may be unfairly imposed on Aaron Surina. His case underscores the need for a fair and impartial judiciary in the resolution of family disputes.
About The Author
