Document: AFFIDAVIT OF PETITIONER IN REPLY
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/41.0 AFFIDAVIT OF PETITIONER IN REPLY 2017-09-25 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2017-09-25
Summary (Justice Demanded)
In the affidavit of the petitioner, the allegations against Aaron Surina by his ex-spouse, Sirinya Surina, cast him in a negative light. However, the veracity of these claims is questionable due to the apparent lack of substantial evidence, suggesting an unfair bias against him in the court proceedings.
Sirinya’s accusations including habitual marijuana use, driving her to the hospital under false pretenses, administering anxiety medication disguised as vitamins, and physical retaliation are only supported by her word, raising doubts about their validity. Additionally, her claim of Aaron setting up a camera to record an incident of physical altercation seems speculative without further evidence.
The document also presents Aaron as irresponsible towards his children and invasive of Sirinya’s privacy without concrete evidence, further undermining his rights as a father. The accusations of Aaron refusing to leave his house after being served with a restraining order and forcing the petitioner and the children to walk by arriving early at an exchange point also paint Aaron in a negative light.
Furthermore, Sirinya’s allegations of Aaron’s control over the children’s school arrangements, forcing her into a divorce without legal representation, and her lack of employment and plans for future work can be seen as attempts to isolate her from decision-making processes and gain sympathy and financial support from the court.
Sirinya’s assertion of a benign meaning behind mistranslated Facebook posts and her insistence on packing her belongings due to the potential sale of the house, although she has no place to go or money to move, indicate possible manipulation to gain court sympathy and delay the sale of the house.
Lastly, her disclosure of a Thai bank account and her claim of all transactions from their joint account being approved by Aaron raises questions about the financial transparency within their relationship.
In conclusion, the affidavit appears to reflect a potential bias against Aaron Surina, presenting a series of allegations without substantial proof, which could lead to unfair treatment or judgement against him in court. This bias could affect his parental rights and financial obligations, further emphasizing the need for a fair and unbiased review of the evidence presented.
About The Author
